This topic contains information on general eligibility requirements for the Full Review process, including:
The Full Review process is a method for the review of new and established condo projects, co-op projects, and certain manufactured home projects. Lenders performing a Full Review must ensure that the project meets all applicable eligibility requirements.
A Full Review may be performed when the unit securing the mortgage is an attached unit located in one of the following project types:
an established condo project, or
a new or newly converted condo project.
A Full Review may also be performed when the property securing the mortgage is manufactured home in an established condo project that is not subject to a community land trust, deed restriction leasehold estate, or shared equity arrangement.
These projects may also be reviewed by Fannie Mae through the PERS process (see B4-2.2-06, Project Eligibility Review Service (PERS)).
Full Review requirements for units in co-op projects are addressed in B4-2.3-02, Co-op Project Eligibility.
Lenders may use Condo Project Manager (CPM) to assist in their Full Review of a project (except for projects containing manufactured homes). CPM is a web-based tool designed to help lenders determine if a project meets Fannie Mae’s eligibility requirements. When CPM is used as part of the project review, the lender must document the loan file with the CPM decision by including the unexpired CPM Certification in the file.
CPM Certifications are based solely on the data that the lender enters into CPM. The lender is responsible for reviewing the applicable project documentation to obtain the information needed to complete the project review and enter the data into CPM. The lender is also responsible for ensuring that all data entered into CPM is correct and that the project meets all applicable Fannie Mae eligibility requirements.
CPM is available on Fannie Mae's website.
When determining the eligibility of a condo project on the basis of a Full Review, lenders must ensure the condo project meets the eligibility requirements described in the following table.
|✓||Full Review Eligibility Requirements|
|The project meets the Requirements Applicable to All Properties in a Condo, Co-op, or PUD Project described in B4-2.1-01, General Information on Project Standards.|
|The project must not be an ineligible project. (See B4-2.1-03, Ineligible Projects).|
|No more than 15% of the total units in a project may be 60 days or more past due on common expense assessments (also known as HOA fees). For example, a 100–unit project may not have more than 15 units that are 60 days or more past due.
This ratio is calculated by dividing the number of units with common expense assessments that are past due by 60 or more days by the total number of units in the project.
|Lenders must review the HOA projected budget to determine that it
To determine whether the association has a minimum annual budgeted replacement reserve allocation of 10%, the lender must divide the annual budgeted replacement reserve allocation by the association’s annual budgeted assessment income (which includes regular common expense fees).
The following types of income may be excluded from the reserve calculation:
The lender may use a reserve study in lieu of calculating the replacement reserve of 10% provided the following conditions are met:
|For projects in which the units are not separately metered for utilities, the lender must
|The project must be located on contiguous parcels of land. It is acceptable for a project to be divided by public or private streets.|
|The structures within the project must be within a reasonable distance from each other.|
|Common elements and facilities, such as recreational facilities and parking, must be consistent with the nature of the project and competitive in the marketplace.|
|Unit owners in the project must have the sole ownership interest in, and rights to the use of the project’s facilities, common elements, and limited common elements, except as noted below.
Shared amenities are permitted only when two or more HOAs share amenities for the exclusive use of the unit owners. The associations must have an agreement in place governing the arrangement for shared amenities that includes the following:
Examples of shared amenities include, but are not limited to, clubhouses, recreational or fitness facilities, and swimming pools.
The developer may not retain any ownership interest in any of the facilities related to the project. The amenities and facilities—including parking and recreational facilities—may not be subject to a lease between the unit owners or the HOA and another party. Parking amenities provided under commercial leases or parking permit arrangements with parties unrelated to the developer are acceptable.
|Fannie Mae permits the financing of a single or multiple parking space(s) with the mortgage provided that the parking space(s) and subject unit are included on one deed as evidenced on the legal description in the mortgage. In such cases, the LTV, CLTV, and HCLTV ratios are based on the combined value of the residential unit and the parking space(s).|
|Phase I and II environmental hazard assessments are not required for condo projects unless the lender identifies an environmental problem through the performance of its project underwriting or due diligence.
In the event that environmental problems are identified, the problems must be acceptable, as described in E-2-02, Suggested Format for Phase I Environmental Hazard Assessments.
|For investment property transactions in established projects at least 50% of the total units in the project must be conveyed to principal residence or second home purchasers. This requirement does not apply if the subject mortgage is for a principal residence or second home.
Financial institution-owned REO units that are for sale (not rented) are considered owner-occupied when calculating the 50% owner-occupancy ratio requirement.
|If the project was a gut rehabilitation project, all rehabilitation work involved in a condo conversion must have been completed in a professional manner.
“Gut rehabilitation” refers to the renovation of a property down to the shell of the structure, including the replacement of all HVAC and electrical components (unless the HVAC and electrical components are up to current code).
For a conversion that was legally created during the past three years, the architect’s or engineer’s report (or functional equivalent), that was originally obtained for the conversion must comment favorably on the structural integrity of the project and the condition and remaining useful life of the major project components, such as the heating and cooling systems, plumbing, electrical systems, elevators, boilers, roof, etc.
When determining the eligibility of condo project consisting of manufactured homes on the basis of a Full Review, lenders must ensure the property and project meet the eligibility requirements described in the following table.
|✓||Additional Requirements for Condo Projects Consisting of Manufactured Home Units|
|As described in B4-2.2-06, Project Eligibility Review Service (PERS), certain manufactured home projects must be submitted to PERS. Lenders must perform a pre-PERS submission review to confirm the project meets the Full Review and other requirements.|
|The condo project must meet all Full Review requirements, as applicable.
CPM should not be relied upon to complete the Full Review because it does not contain all the requirements that apply to condo projects consisting of manufactured homes.
|The project must not contain campgrounds or other facilities for transient or mobile units.|
|The project legal documents must require a provision for land-lease “hold-out” units to be converted into the condo structure upon transfer, sale, or refinance of property. Land lease “hold-out” units are limited to 25% or less of the total units in the project.
Land-lease hold-out units are units where the structure is owned by an individual, but the land is leased from the HOA or project sponsor. These units were not converted to condo ownership when the project converted to a condo regime.
Reserve studies may be used to determine the appropriate level of reserves the HOA must maintain to ensure the project’s long-term success. Reserve studies will also provide useful information regarding the adequacy of the HOA’s current reserve funds and offer recommendations to meet funding goals in the event the HOA has under-reserved for its needs in the past. The lender may review the most current reserve study or a reserve study update provided it has been completed within three years of the date on which the lender approves the project.
Reserve studies must be prepared by an independent third party that has specific expertise in completing reserve studies. This expertise may include any of the following:
a reserve study professional with reserve study credentials,
a construction engineer,
a certified public accountant who specializes in reserve studies, or
any professional with demonstrated knowledge of and experience in completing reserve studies.
While Fannie Mae does not require that a standard format be used for the reserve study, the following items must be addressed:
all major components and elements of the project’s common areas for which repair, maintenance, or replacement is expected;
the condition and remaining useful life of each major component;
an estimate of the cost of repair, replacement, restoration, or maintenance of major components;
an estimate of the total annual contributions required to defray costs (minus the existing reserves funded for this purpose), including inflation;
an analysis of existing funded reserves; and
a suggested reserve funding plan.